Diario de APhoebe, 06 abr. 23

Perfil de APhoebe | < Entrada anterior |Entrada siguiente >

I got a recumbent bike/row machine and I’ve noticed the cals burned is different than my Garmin. I did a morning warmup of 7.5 miles on 2 for an hour. Garmin is reading 170 cals and my bike says 430 cals. Significant difference. Lol Did I take it TOO easy? I can’t sync them so what’s up with this? Did I only burn 170 cals? I would’ve been sitting drinking coffee regardless but that’s a bagel difference to my bank so I might step it up a bit next time. I got super hungry halfway through and bagel math keeps me going. 🤣

Ver Calendario de Dieta, 06 abril 2023:

2026 kcal

Grasa: 86,27g | Prot: 67,73g | Carbh: 251,74g. Almuerzo: off the farm Protein bar Peanut Butter . Cena: Cooked Asparagus (from Fresh), Lea & Perrins The Original Worcestershire Sauce, Butter , Schwan's French Baguette Bread, Stouffer's Lasagna with Meat & Sauce. Pasa Bocas / Otros: Cookie cake. más...

1511 kcal

Ejercicio: Apple Health - 24 horas. más...

25 Seguidores Apoyo

Comentarios

I can't imagine you only burned 170 calories in an hour. It is probably between the two. Is the machine set to your weight? Also, most machines don't subtract BMR for net calories. I'm guessing the 170 is net but still seems a little low.

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: TheUnhealthyDaddy

BTW, that's the downside of being light. My wife is 126lbs and only burns around 300 calories on 15 incline 3.0 for 60mins. I burn over 700 at the same settings.

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: TheUnhealthyDaddy

Do you have your Garmin set to bike riding??

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: Caro1435

From the internet: "A 150-pound man or woman who rides a recumbent bike at a moderate intensity for 30 minutes can expect to burn around 230 calories; that number will double to a total of 460 calories if the same person increases his workout time to 60 minutes" Hope this helps. I guess your speed, intensity, duration and body weight will count towards calories burned.

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: MattRide

I thought it seemed a bit low too. I set my Garmin to indoor cycling but can’t sync to the bike. I can’t personalize the bike with my own settings so I was more inclined to believe my watch. I want to believe my bike. Lol

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: APhoebe

What a great question to ponder! They say that your watch should not be trusted as it is not 100% accurate but I did read that if you use it all the time you should be able to figure out where your balance comes in for calories in. I would agree with everyone else here that you would have burned more than 170 calories.

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: Redporchlady

did you enter your weight into garmin connect app profile? your garmin will be drastically more accurate then what the bike says. what heart rate zone were you in for uour spin

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: ObeseToBeast123

also for indoor cycling to have the most accurate reading, you can buy a garmin speed and cadence sensor that link up to your watch and you will get much more accurate readings that way that's what I have on my bike that lives in the trainer my gym

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: ObeseToBeast123

All of my info is in Garmin and I was doing a leisurely zone 1, 2. My bike does have pulse sensors but I was messing around on my phone. It was a let’s move your legs while waking up workout. Lol The watch wins. Otb thanks for the tip. That sounds like something I’d be interested in..

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: APhoebe

IMO not even worth trying to track calories out 😕 … but you can infer it from calories in & weight change (assuming 3500 cal / lb)

06 abr. 23 por el miembro: johncip


	Enviar un Comentario Debes iniciar sesión para enviar un comentario. Has clic Aquí* para iniciar sesión*

Peso Histórico de APhoebe

Ver la Historia Completa

Diario de APhoebe, 06 abr. 23

Enviar un Comentario

Peso Histórico de APhoebe